GPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mastercard has a net margin of 12.68% compared to Global Payments's net margin of 45.24%. Global Payments's return on equity of 6.75% beat Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12%.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $97.41, signalling upside risk potential of 28.64%. On the other hand Mastercard has an analysts' consensus of $616.93 which suggests that it could grow by 8.32%. Given that Global Payments has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Global Payments is more attractive than Mastercard.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.937%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Mastercard offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Global Payments pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Mastercard quarterly revenues of $7.3B. Global Payments's net income of $305.7M is lower than Mastercard's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while Mastercard's PE ratio is 39.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 1.89x versus 18.06x for Mastercard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransDigm Group has a net margin of 12.68% compared to Global Payments's net margin of 22.28%. Global Payments's return on equity of 6.75% beat TransDigm Group's return on equity of --.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $97.41, signalling upside risk potential of 28.64%. On the other hand TransDigm Group has an analysts' consensus of $1,521.32 which suggests that it could grow by 8.05%. Given that Global Payments has higher upside potential than TransDigm Group, analysts believe Global Payments is more attractive than TransDigm Group.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.586%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. TransDigm Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share. Global Payments pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. TransDigm Group pays out 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but TransDigm Group's is not.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than TransDigm Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Global Payments's net income of $305.7M is lower than TransDigm Group's net income of $479M. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while TransDigm Group's PE ratio is 47.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 1.89x versus 9.74x for TransDigm Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has a net margin of 12.68% compared to Global Payments's net margin of -16.21%. Global Payments's return on equity of 6.75% beat TOMI Environmental Solutions's return on equity of -57.67%.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $97.41, signalling upside risk potential of 28.64%. On the other hand TOMI Environmental Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 332.1%. Given that TOMI Environmental Solutions has higher upside potential than Global Payments, analysts believe TOMI Environmental Solutions is more attractive than Global Payments.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOMI Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.687%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. TOMI Environmental Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Payments pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. TOMI Environmental Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than TOMI Environmental Solutions quarterly revenues of $1.6M. Global Payments's net income of $305.7M is higher than TOMI Environmental Solutions's net income of -$255.6K. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while TOMI Environmental Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 1.89x versus 2.03x for TOMI Environmental Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of 12.68% compared to Global Payments's net margin of 47.71%. Global Payments's return on equity of 6.75% beat Visa's return on equity of 50.81%.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $97.41, signalling upside risk potential of 28.64%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $377.13 which suggests that it could grow by 5.25%. Given that Global Payments has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Global Payments is more attractive than Visa.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.345%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Visa offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Global Payments pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Global Payments's net income of $305.7M is lower than Visa's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while Visa's PE ratio is 36.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 1.89x versus 19.02x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.